Related topics

My new mistress - OT but a result of my new WOL
vp24n...@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu comp os linux hardware up until recently? see below. trivial? with the multiboot standard taking shape, and people writing multiboot loaders Obviously the people programming the kernel didn't think the problem was worth fixing at the time, or this BIOS call was kept secret like the

Cross-compiler OK, Hurd boots! Next project - fix SMP!
So, the FAT32 problem should have hit a relatively few systems that found need for the combination prior to the fix that still doesn't exist. M$ broke the multiboot compatibility (among other things). Prior to the break, OS/2 had access to the windos stuff on C: and every other FAT partition. By creating a fix that

Vista installer on multiboot system messed it up
Specifically, one can boot directly into DOS, without going through Windows 95, from the NT multiboot menu. In fact, I have no doubt that OS/2 and other .... When Windows NT setup finishes fixing your bootup files, copy the resulting BOOTSECT.DOS file to BOOTSECT.W40 or BOOTSECT.W95 or some other filename that

Why dual boot?
Is yours a multiboot system? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kurt V. Hindenburg" <khindenb...@cherrynebula.net> To: "misc-obsd" <m...@openbsd.org> How to go about fixing this? % fdisk wd0 Disk: wd0 geometry: 9729/255/63 [156296385 Sectors] Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55 Starting Ending LBA Info: #: id C H S

3.1R install/multiboot problem
You can even elect to dual boot or multiboot as you wish. If you start fixing the proliferating millions of lines of code by making online sources your so called administrative tool, it seems that a single vendor suddenly becomes a more ominous choice. Now how do you depend on having support for that 3rd party

NE2000 card not detected...
... tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: [snip] 2) extended facilities (a bootloader being a minimal kernel running on the bare metal for debugging/fixing/exploring) would be better handled by working on the NetBSD kernel and framework (libstand, both for MI and reuse of existing code is already there for example).

Warning !! Partition Magic and Norton Speed Disk
... to fixing that problem yet! My computer does the same thing, but it's a new CD-burner (24x10x40). The one I had before did the same thing (12x10x32). I can't even use other programs like nero or the bundled NTI software, without the computer crashing. I had to set up my computer as multiboot with win98 so I can

The "64M bug"
I used PartitionMagic to create the partitions for my multiboot configuration and have run the native defrag program with no problems. The procedure for fixing this is posted on the Symantec support site (it's the least they could do, since they screweed up hard drive to begin with by moving the root directory

Acronis Disk Director Server v10.0.2169 FULL +SERIAL (Vista Ready!)
Ah. So if M$ has serious bugs in SCANDISK and they don't want to fix them, then it's okay. But if IBM is going after the standard then it's bad, because they don't hunt M$ pseudo standards down the road. IIRC, it was IBM that created Boot Manager, and the purpose of Boot Manager was to facilitate multiboot.

Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10.
Problems like this are not all that uncommon when you install your multiboot using the Microsoft multiboot technique. That's why third-party boot managers With third-party managers, each OS can be fully installed within its own standalone partition, and "fixing" one wouldn't have to touch the other partitions.

Newbie Fundamental Question
INI in an NTFS partition from DOS or Win9x" </quote> Example of use, see: "Fixing Windows 2000/XP BOOT.INI Files" <http://www.goodells.net/multiboot/editbini.htm> Freeware license: <http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/fwlic. html> #3)-------------------------------- Program: Display Partition Information [PARTINFO.

my monitor streched horizontally for some reason plz help?
Dont forget if you want to multiboot you need a partition manager and a multiboot manager. Email for advice... Again a good system with plenty of apps. The developers specialise in finding and fixing unix security holes at source. If _this_ is your bag then get OpenBSD, otherwise the others are better,

redhat-digest Digest V99 #210
Terry Lambert tlambe...@mindspring.com lucky freebsd chat David Schultz wrote: Multiboot works just fine right now, but it's not going to resize your NTFS partition for you. I previously argued that effort would be better spent fixing other things that can go wrong with the install, but Terry sez resizing NTFS

Why dual boot?
Problem: Bootbar Win98 må vist ligge innefor første 8BG på disken, se: <http://www.goodells.net/multiboot/diskedit.htm> Noen linker som kan komme til nytte: "How do I install Windows® 98/Me after I've installed XP" <http://www.dougknox.com/xp/tips/xp_repair_9x.htm>. "Fixing Windows 2000/XP BOOT.

Multiboot with Red Hat Linux
... personal recommendation is to use a boot disk when you want to load Redhat. By using a boot disk to boot Redhat, if you need to reinstall XP or Redhat, you do not have to deal with fixing the boot loader after the reinstall. -- Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP xpn...@michaelstevenstech.com http://michaelstevenstech.com.

Fixing a MBR (and more) that ??? trashed
Juergen Keil j...@tools.de alt solaris x86 "teknokrat" <teknok...@mindless.com> writes: [ fixing top-posting ] "Juergen Keil" <j...@tools.de> wrote in message fixing a solaris system that does not boot any more. See http://math.uwb.edu.pl/~mariusz/multiboot/iii/1.html how you can fix / restore an "x86 boot partition".

Sound Card for Win2k
I only just installed SuSe, don't have yaboot or os-chooser setup to multiboot (should be possible to trick yaboot to choose just between OS 9 and OS X Fortunately the fix is quite simple, once you boot back into GNU/Linux (you will probably have to enter OpenFirmware and do this yourself guessing the new

Multiboot trouble (nt boot loader)
To summarize for me (but this exceeds what jmmv original mail was about), considering boot and GRUB: 1) some GRUB facilities would be better incorporated in some version of a NetBSD stage2; 2) extended facilities (a bootloader being a minimal kernel running on the bare metal for debugging/fixing/exploring) would be

multi boot
Revision 1.7 2007/11/03 01:33:34 anoop # Minor Bug fix # # Revision 1.6 2007/11/03 01:22:45 anoop # Sanitize pathnames before use, or else tar will complain. ..... os.path.join(source_dir,'boot','multiboot'):tftp_solaris_dir, os.path.join(source_dir,'boot','grub','pxegrub'):tftp_dir, } # Copy the Kernel and the

Multiboot support for review
It has 60 Gigs of disk space, so I intended to make a multiboot, XP/2K/98 XP is OK but the sound drivers for 98 and 2000 don't work. I suspect, based on years of fixing these "things", that you got the right files for the model you have, but that you got the WRONG files for the motherboard you DO have.