Related topics

Indepth partition help needed
Yes .... BUT! You have three XP installations plus a Vista installation. Exactly which bootblock will you be 'fixing'? I suspect you will be unable to boot your Vista after 'fixing' your XP bootblock. If you were using GRUB I could tell you exactly how to fix your problem. But I know nothing about Bootmagic :o(

Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1962 - 15 msgs
The GRUB [1] developers came up with the idea of designing a "standard" protocol between boot loaders and OS kernels, known as the Multiboot Actually, I made some work for GRUB some years ago, indeed fixing the El Torito booting problem and trying to rework the directories hierarchy to try to separate MI code

NT can't see my FAT but Linux can (long)
THEY assume base hwclock time is UTC\GMT (this is unix-normal, but plays havoc with multiboot or multi O\S boxes that assume local time for hwclock if clients I figured this out becasue every time I booted into something else, clock was off, BIOS had clock off, fixing for that O\S resulted in Linux resseting my

Restoring multiboot options
I think DFSee has a way of fixing the BM-won't-boot-it problem, but either I couldn't get it to work or it required too much fussing, so when I installed SUSE 10.1 a couple months ago, I just let it put up its boot manager. with SUSE 9.1, I ended up using Veit Kannegieser's Vpart, which worked quite well,

help - dual boot
I want install linux but know the hassles involved in fixing the MBR and boot sector for win2k if win98 is already installed. FWIW, I cover these topics in my book, _The Multi-Boot Configuration Handbook_ (http://www.rodsbooks.com/multiboot/), although the number of possible permutations of boot loaders and OSs

Indepth partition help needed
For ditt prosjekt finner du da mulig det du trenger her: <http://www.goodells. net/multiboot/> - se der blandt annet en side (men titt på alle sidene) som viser "Fixing Windows 2000/XP BOOT.INI Files" <http://www.goodells.net/multiboot/editbini.htm> ved hjelp av et gratisverktøy som man kjører fra DOS(!

Progress report
Will try to fix this tonight and report back if anything interesting comes up. As for that second partition that says "OS/2 Hidden" - as far as I can tell 8) The Fix: I'd start by fixing the fdisk partition table, getting rid of the overlap, and then following the installboot and PBR extraction process again,

Vista installer on multiboot system messed it up
She always gets these ideas about fixing up or redecorating or building on so she doesn't need that one either. (Less time for the bike if I'm having to paint or wallpaper How many computers can be used at any one time I wasn't doing anything with 7 that I couldn't have done with two with multiboot partitions.

CVS Update: (anoop) rocks/src/roll/solaris/src/command/commands ...
telia.com microsoft public windows vista installation_setup Yes .... BUT! You have three XP installations plus a Vista installation. Exactly which bootblock will you be 'fixing'? Don't know this process in detail. It has worked for years using Win95, 98, NT4, 2000 and XP, mixed freely. Does Vista contain some new

you're getting a vald, dude! Re: Fallacy site (was Re ...
Your solution, and bub's, are more elegant, I had a cooker I could not get into because no boot floppy and lilo had recreated my old main boot. So, this is a way to get back in also, even if just for a time. Thanks to both of you. I was hoping to get more ideas before kinda fixing on a couple set ways,

Installasjon av Win98 etter WinXP
0); + printf("multiboot: Symbol table at %p, length %d bytes\n", + ms->s_symstart, ms->s_symsize); + printf("multiboot: String table at %p, length %d bytes\n", .... Returns true if this was + * passed in by Multiboot; false otherwise. */ -static void -setup_syms(struct multiboot_info *mi __unused) +boolean_t

Anyone give me a step by step to setting up raid 0?
Which makes Linux superior when multiboot is a consideration. Or is SUN working on fixing that? Why should something been fixed that isn't broken? Sun's inability to follow twenty year-old PC specifications means Solaris is broken, if only a little. So Linux' inability to follow 30 year old Unix specifications

Fixing multiboot capabilities
An NT emergency repair disk (recently made) will allow fixing that and allowing NT to boot again. If it is necessary to add other operating systems to the NT multiboot menu (that are not automatically added) note: There is nothing very tricky about the boot process. The BIOS does it's stuff,then checks for a floppy

Sistema multiboot, richiesta di consiglio.
8) The Fix: I'd start by fixing the fdisk partition table, getting rid of the overlap, and then following the installboot and PBR extraction process again, Cool as this solution is, however, I prefer "properly configured" systems, so fix your partition table... Besides, I'm not sure what is in that "OS/2

Indepth partition help needed
A bios boot menu is the same as a multiboot menu with a microsoft O/S. You press one key and you have a boot menu. If you change operating systems often your A kind of "Fixing the volsnap.sys issue for Dummies." "Lance Le Claire" <l...@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:evb0m1xdIHA.6136@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl.

Activator by SUN ?
I was running linux with a multiboot setup for a couple months and everything worked fine. I was multibooting linux, NT, Win95 and DOS 6.22. I recently removed NT, This problem up only after I reinstalled lilo. Has anyone had this type of problem or have any suggestions as to how to go about fixing it. Thanks.

CVS Update: (anoop) rocks/src/roll/solaris/nodes
Kent W. England [MVP] k...@mvps.org microsoft public windowsxp setup_deployment You don't have to reinstall XP, you have to fix the system files on the C: drive. You need to boot from the XP CD and run the Recovery Console (first repair option). Then copy the ntldr and ntdetect.com files from \i386 on the CD to the

NT and RISCos together?
Kevin Kubish kubi0...@yahoo.com alt certification a-plus I actually had a nice multiboot system going for a while. Linux-Mandrake, Win2000, WinME, and WinXP-beta. Unfortunately, I sneezed wrong and spent a few long days fixing stuff. Now I just have ME and 2000. I've actually got them both on the same partition

Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10.
Both kernels are multiboot kernel images, so GRUB treats them the same. Both kernels provide the precise same system call and RPC interface to the (There are probably some loose ends I knowingly broke and didn't get around to fixing, eg I would not be surprised if the mach_i386.defs RPC interfaces don't all

Fixing multiboot capabilities
Unfortunately I do not have any help for you, except that my problem may be in the multiboot setup that I have.... and the corruption of the W2K registries, So what went wrong and how can I fix the problem? I have too much stuff on that drive to start all over again. I'd prefer fixing the boot problem since the